<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Design Watch &#187; Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/category/typography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:26:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Easy = True</title>
		<link>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2010/02/easy-true/</link>
		<comments>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2010/02/easy-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry Woodbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/?p=2432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article on &#8220;cognitive fluency&#8221; offers this great (ironic) infographic:

Reporter Drake Bennett leads with the fact that &#8220;shares in companies with easy-to-pronounce names do ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article on &#8220;cognitive fluency&#8221; offers this great (ironic) infographic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/01/31/easy__true/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2433" title="Easy = True" src="http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/art1__1264872682_4038.jpg" alt="Easy = True" width="539" height="382" /></a></p>
<p>Reporter Drake Bennett leads with the fact that &#8220;shares in companies with easy-to-pronounce names do indeed significantly outperform those with hard-to-pronounce names.&#8221; He continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>Other studies have shown that when presenting people with a factual statement, manipulations that make the statement easier to mentally process &#8211; even totally nonsubstantive changes like <strong>writing it in a cleaner font or making it rhyme or simply repeating it</strong> &#8211; can alter people’s judgment of the truth of the statement, along with their evaluation of the intelligence of the statement’s author (my emphasis).</p></blockquote>
<p>However, the flip side of easy equals true &#8212; or &#8220;an instinctive preference for the familiar&#8221; as Bennett defines the concept &#8212; is that to generate reflection or curiosity, you may need to make things less familiar. It&#8217;s a good thing we know how to do both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2010/02/easy-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typography on TV</title>
		<link>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2009/11/whats-lucida-handwriting-1992-doing-here/</link>
		<comments>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2009/11/whats-lucida-handwriting-1992-doing-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry Woodbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/?p=1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times runs a breezy article on typography mistakes in popular culture which fortunately links to Mark Simonson&#8217;s incisive review of the typography ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/arts/16iht-design16.html">The <em>New York Times</em> runs a breezy article on typography mistakes in popular culture</a> which fortunately links to <a href="http://www.marksimonson.com/article/236/mad-men-mad-props">Mark Simonson&#8217;s incisive review of the typography in the television show &#8220;Mad Men&#8221;</a>. Here&#8217;s an sample of Simonson&#8217;s critique:</p>
<blockquote><p>These lipstick ads feature Fenice (1980) with Balmoral (1978) for the script caps. Amazone (1958) for the script lowercase is fine here, but the outline looks too much like a modern computer graphics effect (which is what it is).</p>
<p><a href="http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mm-bellejolie.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1926" title="Belle Jolie Ad from Mad Men" src="http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mm-bellejolie.jpg" alt="Belle Jolie Ad from Mad Men" width="350" height="195" /></a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/2009/11/whats-lucida-handwriting-1992-doing-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
